|
GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS
BY JOHN MITERKO, CHAIR,
VVA GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS COMMITTEE,
WITH VVA GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS
STAFF
Human parasites who profiteer during a time of war
through price-gouging, bid-rigging, embezzlement, kickbacks,
fraud, and outright theft deserve prison time, not slap-on-the-wrist
fines.
This was the theme of a brief and pointed hearing on
Capitol Hill on March 20 conducted by Senators Patrick Leahy
(D-Vt.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and
Arlen Specter (R-Penn.), ranking member of the committee.
They were joined by a trio of colleagues from both sides
of the political spectrum, Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), Russ Feingold
(D-Wisc.), and Ben Cardin (D-Md.).
They heard testimony from
Stuart W. Bowen, Jr., special inspector general for Iraq
reconstruction, known as SIGIR; Thomas F. Gimble, acting
inspector general for the Department of Defense; and a very
upbeat Barry Sabin, deputy assistant attorney general in
the Criminal Division, Department of Justice.
Leahy opened
the hearing by quoting Abraham Lincoln, who called profiteers “worse
than traitors.” In his
essay, “War Is a Racket,” Marine Brigadier General
Smedley Darlington Butler, twice a recipient of the Medal
of Honor, railed against those who would profit unduly while
soldiers and Marines were getting killed and maimed.
“Today,
an Administration seemingly not thinking twice about shipping
plane-loads of greenbacks to Iraq with no controls in place,
a situation ripe for, and rife with, greedheads, has succeeded
in undercutting, in hindering the war effort.”
Billions
of dollars have just disappeared, Leahy said, citing the
unprecedented use of private contractors. Citing the more
than $12 billion that is simply unaccounted for, Leahy conveyed
his displeasure to the panelists.
Senator Specter was just
as outraged at “contractors
who are taking advantage while brave young men and women
are giving their lives and losing their limbs. He, like his
colleague, named names: Halliburton, Kellogg Brown & Root,
and Eagle Global Logistics.
The relatively small fines “are
a license to steal,” Specter
charged. “They are no incentive not to violate the
law.”
“A few million in fines for multi-millions
in overruns is no deterrent,” echoed Leahy.
The panelists, of course, attempted to defend the efforts
of the Administration to crack down on fraud and abuse. Bowen
attempted to shift blame from the shoulders of American contractors
to corruption in the Iraqi government “in virtually
every ministry.” He cited 2,000 investigations conducted
by his office of Iraqi officials involving $8 billion in
missing funds.
Similar acts by U.S. corporations are “relatively
small and aggressively pursued,” he claimed. “Corruption
within the U.S. program in Iraq, while egregious where we
have found it, has been a relatively minor component of the
overall effort,” Bowen insisted. “Waste, on the
other hand, has been a significantly more serious issue.”
Yet the numbers he cited, and he cited lots of numbers, were
disheartening. To date, more than 300 criminal and civil
investigations have yielded 10 arrests, five indictments,
five convictions, and two malefactors sent to prison. Part
of the difficulty, he explained, is the lack of any electronic
paper trail.
DoD’s Gimble also attempted to put a good
face on a bad situation, tossing out a jumble of numbers.
Since the beginning of the Global War on Terror, investigations
by DCIS, the Defense Criminal Investigative Service, have
resulted in four federal criminal indictments, nine federal
criminal informations, and two Article 32 hearings under
the Uniform Code of Military Justice. This resulted in nine
convictions for felony crimes, for a combined total of 14-1/2
years of confinement and nine years of probation. Additionally,
two individuals and one company were barred from contracting
with the U.S. government, 17 companies and personnel were
suspended, and two contractors signed settlement agreements
with the government.
Overall, Gimble proudly pointed out,
some $9.84 million was paid to the U.S. in restitution, $322,000
was levied in fines and penalties, $3,500 was forfeited,
and SIGIR recovered some $10 million in cash and contraband.
Leahy
was less than impressed. Part of the difficulty, he implied,
is not enough staff. Every time he asked Gimble and Bowen
if they could use additional investigators, their answers
were vague.
“Are we being as aggressive as we need to
be?” questioned
Sen. Cardin. He was upset, too, because the jobs done by
contractors were inferior.
To give teeth to the agencies charged
with uncovering and prosecuting abuse, Sen. Leahy introduced
the War Profiteering Prevention Act of 2007, S. 119, which
would strengthen the tools available to federal prosecutors
to combat profiteering. Passed in the 109th Congress, it
died when the GOP-controlled House failed to act on it.
Will
it pass in the 110th Congress? VVA encourages our members
to ask their senators and members of Congress to vote in
the affirmative. While our troops are valiantly doing their
jobs, their efforts should not be hindered by corrupt practices,
particularly by American corporations.
What does all of this
have to with veterans’ issues?
The answer is that veterans are constantly told there is
not enough money to undo the downsizing of the Army’s
Medical Department since 2001, and that VVA is unrealistic
when we ask for the minimum increase in VA veterans health
care dollars needed to maintain current levels—never
mind system improvements to get the job done—for veterans
of all generations.
The increases that VVA has asked for each
year are much less than the amount that appears to have been
stolen from the American taxpayers during that same period.
As everyone is aware, the Federal budget is in large measure
a “zero-sum
game” in that dollars spent one place take away from
dollars needed elsewhere. What Abraham Lincoln said about
war profiteers—that they are worse than traitors—still
holds true.
DéJA VU ALL OVER AGAIN
Sen. Daniel Akaka’s Committee on Veterans’ Affairs
held an oversight hearing on “DoD/VA Collaboration
and Cooperation to Meet the Health Care Needs of Returning
Service members.” At its conclusion, a colleague said, “Does
it seem to you that we’ve heard this about seven times
before?”
The theme of the March 27 hearing was the dovetailing
of services between the two departments and how to realize
the by-now clichéd “seamless transition.” Everyone
agrees it’s a good idea, but all the interagency task
forces and executive councils and many meetings and memos
have resulted in very little concrete progress.
Said freshman
Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), “Veterans
should not have to fight for their benefits.” The answer,
said fellow freshman Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.), lies in finding
effective ways to achieve collaboration and coordination.
Part
of the problem is the bottom line: There is not enough funding
to meet the needs of patients. Denise Mettie, whose son,
Evan, was grievously wounded in Iraq on New Year’s
Day 2006, pointed out that more than half the beds at the
VA’s Polytrauma Center in Palo Alto, California, remain
unfilled because administrators don’t have the funds
to hire the staff they need.
Former Major Tammy Duckworth,
the helicopter pilot who lost both legs when her bird crashed
in Iraq, and Captain John Pruden, who also suffered major
wounds in Baghdad, praised the medical miracles of DoD doctors
and bemoaned the holes in aftercare.
Dr. Michael Kussman,
whose title at the time was executive-in-charge of the Veterans
Health Administration, and Ellen Embrey, Deputy Assistant
Secretary of Defense for Force Health Protection and Readiness,
each gave rosy, statistics-laden overviews of what their
respective departments are doing to meet the medical needs
of their patients.
Embrey, though, was not very good in responding
to questions posed by Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.). “Does
DoD have the capability today to electronically transfer
health records to the VA?” he asked. “Yes,” came
Embrey’s
tentative reply.
“But how many stories must we hear to the contrary?” Burr
pondered. “Why not invest in flash drives to get information
to the families of the wounded?”
Hopefully, before the
next such hearing, the two departments will have made major
inroads in achieving some semblance of a reasonable transition
from military medical care to veterans’ health care
at the VA, and Congress will have added funding to improve
the health care delivery by both DoD and VA. What is needed,
however, is for the political will to exist at DoD to quit
dissembling and get it done. It appears to us that the VA
has been willing in this regard all along and already has
an automated patient-treatment record that works well. Therefore,
the problem seems to be with the DoD. The need now is urgent,
as much for the aging population of Vietnam veterans with
increasing medical needs as the new wounded from Iraq and
Afghanistan.
VA HEALTH CARE BUDGET FOR FY’08
If they had their druthers, some at the Office of Management & Budget
(OMB) and currently on the Domestic Policy Council in this
White House would eviscerate the VA health care system. They
would ax Priority 7 and 8 veterans from the rolls forever
and cut funding, all the while claiming that the monies budgeted
to fund the system are adequate to “continue to provide
timely, world-class health care to a growing number of veterans
who need it the most including expanded services for veterans
returning from Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operating Enduring
Freedom,” to borrow from a recent VA press release.
As
we have in recent years, VVA has serious disagreements with
the VA leadership about how much money is needed to fund
what is the largest health care system in the world. In fact,
what is, at minimum, needed for FY 2008, which begins October
1, 2007, is an increase of $6.9 billion more than the current
year, assuming that we ultimately get the $1.7 billion additional
veterans health care dollars from the Emergency Supplemental,
which the Administration is opposing. If we do not get those
extra funds, then timeliness of service, access, quality
of care, and patient safety all will be compromised.
VVA will
continue to press for enough resources and proper accountability
for both quality of care, services, and cost effectiveness,
no matter who is in power in the Congress or in the White
House. What’s right is right—and
it is wrong to short-change veterans of any generation.
HONORING
MEMBERS OF CONGRESS WHO SERVED
On April 25, VVA National President John Rowan hosted a reception
at the Washington Court Hotel for friends and supporters
of VVA, honoring members of Congress who served in the Armed
Forces.
Freshman Representative Tim Walz of Minnesota was
among those who attended. “Your voice is being heard,” he
said of VVA. “Your voice is being translated by this
Congress into action.” Congressman Walz is the highest
ranking enlisted soldier ever to be elected to the United
States Congress. He led his unit to Iraq as Command Sergeant
Major.
Another fresh presence in the 110th Congress, Representative
Nancy Boyda of Kansas, said that “what you do as VVA
makes a real difference. Thank you for your support, and
let me know what I can do to help you.” She also remembered
VVA activist Randy Barnes in her remarks, praising his passion
for and commitment to his fellow veterans.
Nebraska Senator
Chuck Hagel opened by saying he was “always
glad to be among Rick Weidman’s rich friends,” which
elicited an appreciative chuckle from the crowd. Senator
Hagel, often mentioned as a possible presidential contender,
is the only enlisted combat veteran of Vietnam in the United
States Senate and a VVA member. Hagel spoke of how the Vietnam
War shaped a generation. He lamented the “disconnect
in our society: the responsibility, the obligation of citizens
to connect to a cause greater than one’s own self-interest.” Veterans
groups, like VVA, “are more important than ever before
to bridge those citizenship gaps,” he said.
Current
Ranking Republican on the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs
Steve Buyer praised VVA leadership. He noted that it was
John Rowan and Rick Weidman, not the leadership of the American
Legion or VFW or DAV who came to his office to discuss issues
and matters of disagreement. And for this, he was profoundly
grateful. “Our sincerity and compassion is real,” the
congressman said. “We both have the same goals.”
Among
those who came to show their support for VVA and for all
veterans was Kevin Gillen, president of the Metro Washington
market for Commerce Bank. Just as his bank is “all
about service,” so, too, are “the real heroes,
those who served and those who are serving” in the
Armed Forces. Also present were officials of a number of
unions, including AFGE, AFSCME, and SEIU.
COMMISSION ON AMERICA’S
RETURNING WOUNDED WARRIORS
VVA testified before the President’s Commission on
America’s Returning Wounded Warriors on April 14, 2007,
the first public meeting of this group, co-chaired by former
Sen. Bob Dole and former Secretary of Health & Human
Services, Donna Shalala. VVA noted that recent revelations
of poor care at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC)
is a consequence of a policy to fight this war “on
the cheap” and, by extension, to take care of our servicemembers
the same way. To downsize the number of physicians and allied
health care personnel in the military as one enters a war
is both unprecedented and irresponsible. The immediate official
cries that the problems at WRAMC were not a question of resources
should have indicated to all that it was and is in large
part a question of resources. Dr. Winkenwerder was brought
to his job as Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs
precisely because of his experience in advising large private
health care entities on how to reduce costs by cutting services.
VVA
further noted that it is our understanding that the dramatic
reduction in the Army Medical Corps (and commensurate cuts
in the Air Force and Navy) since 2001 are to be reversed,
at least in the Army. If we understand correctly, there will
be up to 3,000 clinicians added, although it will take time
to “ramp up” to full strength.
Much of the overcrowding
at WRAMC and at other facilities has led to soldiers in inadequate
quarters and facing delays that impact quality of care. While
individual care is first rate, the problem is getting appointments
when they are needed, lack of care continuity, and proper
case management.
The number of clinicians must be increased,
and medical resources used more efficiently. We have great
hope that the current commander at Walter Reed Army Medical
Center, and those at all other military hospitals, will be
given additional resources needed to do the job, so that
key changes will occur in a timely way to insure proper care
of our troops.
Another problem is case management. The case
management system at WRAMC and elsewhere in the military
is not working properly. There are not enough persons designated
as full-time case managers. Nor are they always the personnel
with the background and training to be effective in this
demanding role. This has resulted in many problems for wounded,
injured, and sick soldiers that should never have happened.
Additionally,
there are tracking systems in use at some DOD hospitals but
not at the majority of them, including Walter Reed. All should
use available electronic monitoring systems beginning immediately,
and a simple but effective tracking mechanism should be used
by every case manager, with proper oversight by superiors.
While
all are serious problems, these are problems that can be
fixed if strong commanders are given the proper resources,
a clear mandate for improvement, and held accountable for
results. WRAMC has hired twenty-five new case managers, but
VVA would argue that this is probably not enough. Further,
the key is their training, the tools given to them, the ongoing
supervision, and ensuring proper quality of care at every
phase.
VVA also noted that the medical board system is deeply
flawed. Although some high-ranking individuals in the Army
may be right that perceived inequities are, to some degree,
due to the nature of the military’s medical retirement
guidelines and legal requirements/constraints, even within
that context there are terrible injustices perpetrated on
more wounded soldiers every day.
These fine young Americans
who have already given so much are too often treated like
chattel, not like American citizens who voluntarily pledged
life and limb in defense of the Constitution and have paid
a great price for defending our Republic. This must change
immediately.
VVA recommends an immediate end to buy-out payments,
where essentially soldiers are being bought off at pennies
on the dollar. Also, there must be proper education, advice,
and quality representation for all service members going
through this process, which does not now exist. The separation
physical should be a joint VA/DOD physical. Military medical
records (both paper and electronic where it exists) should
be given both to the separating individual and transferred
to the VA. This is supposed to happen, but doesn’t
in most cases.
How well returning soldiers are treated by
the military medical system, and how they are treated in
the medical boards process has a direct and major impact
on the VA system that begins almost immediately. What the
military bungles, VA must spend much more money and many
more resources to fix what should have been done correctly
for the soldier before medical discharge. What happens to
soon-to-be veterans will have a major impact on the already
struggling VA benefits system, and the already over-crowded
and under-resourced VA medical system. This is why we have
taken the unusual step of delving so deeply into these issues
in this space.
DOD MISSES CONTRACTING GOAL WITH DISABLED VET
BUSINESSES BY $26 BILLION
The Department of Defense fell $26 billion short of their
minimum legally mandated goal of contracting 3 percent of
all DOD contracts with Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small
Businesses (SDVOSB) from FY 2000 through FY 2005. In a letter
to Secretary of Defense, VVA National President John Rowan
noted “DOD simply must be able to be in better compliance
with the law than this record shows thus far. Is this one
more instance of simply casting those wounded or sick from
war aside, without proper respect for both what they have
done and for their remaining capabilities for what they can
still do now that they are no longer in uniform?”
VVA
and other veterans advocates are working with DOD to help
DOD both understand their obligations, and to help forge
a plan to meet those legal and moral obligations.
BYE, BYE
NICHOLSON?
Freshman Rep. Phil Hare, who succeeded his former boss, Lane
Evans, as congressman from the 17th Congressional District
in Illinois, has called for the resignation of VA Secretary
R. James Nicholson in light of the coverage of executive
bonuses paid to high-ranking VA officials.
“Veterans
deserve a secretary that will fight for them, not use his
or her authority to advance an ideological agenda,” Hare
said in a press release. “Our veterans have suffered
tremendous setbacks on Secretary Nicholson’s watch.
After presiding over a $1 billion shortfall, a backlog of
600,000 disability cases, staffing shortages at Vet Centers,
two security breaches that jeopardized the personal information
of our veterans, and now, lavish bonuses to the very VA officials
responsible for the whole mess, it is time to say enough
is enough.”
We agree, however, with Sen. Daniel Akaka,
who chairs the Veterans’ Affairs Committee in the Senate.
According to one news report, Akaka “was not certain
that senior members of the budget staff at the VA deserved
bonuses averaging $33,000 about 20 percent of their annual
salaries when the VA had a major budget crisis because costs
were underestimated.”
Bonuses can be a valuable tool
to retain experienced senior managers. But we simply do not
believe that all those who received bonuses deserve them.
Were they rewarded when they ought to have been sanctioned
for not performing up to expectations?
It should be about
accountability, which is not, unfortunately, how the VA central
office tends to operate.
|